This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Decision on NWI-4 INETNUM status values
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Decision on NWI-4 INETNUM status values
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Decision on NWI-4 INETNUM status values
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arash Naderpour
arash.naderpour at gmail.com
Mon Apr 4 18:44:31 CEST 2022
Hi Denis, That would be great to have a way to assign a whole allocation without splitting it to smaller assignments. I support the idea of having a new status value. Regards, Arash Naderpour On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 10:39 PM denis walker via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > Colleagues > > For many years people have been asking for a way to assign a whole > allocation without having to create 2 smaller assignments. The > situation is more relevant now with so many /24 allocations. After the > RIPE NCC rejected the idea of a dual primary key, for technical > reasons, there were two options on the table. Making the "status:" > attribute multiple or creating a new status value 'ALLOCATED-ASSIGNED > PA'. No one has objected to either of these options. The co-chairs > therefore recommend the option put forward by the RIPE NCC to add a > new status value 'ALLOCATED-ASSIGNED PA'. Of the two options, this is > probably the simplest and likely to cause less problems with user's > scripts that parse objects. > > If there are no objections to this, the co-chairs now ask the RIPE NCC > to produce an impact/implementation report to add this new status > value and include the business rules to restrict it's use. We will > then seek a final approval from the community on the report. > > cheers > denis > co-chair DB-WG > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20220405/4820e042/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Decision on NWI-4 INETNUM status values
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Decision on NWI-4 INETNUM status values
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]