This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] What do you think of our new UI?
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] What do you think of our new UI?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] What do you think of our new UI?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Thu Sep 2 20:52:17 CEST 2021
In message <9AC1F1FA-5562-4FB1-9FAF-DC2F9949579C at ripe.net>, Edward Shryane <eshryane at ripe.net> wrote: >We kindly ask you to take part in the survey and help us improve the >user experience for you. > >You can access the survey at: >https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/RIPENCCservicesUI OK, so I'm trying to helpfully take the survey, but... Right away I hit a snag, probably caused by my own geeky but strong tendencies to (a) take everything literally and (b) make everything that is simple complicated (by over-thinking everything). The survey asks if I am happy with "RIPE Database". Is that in reference ONLY to the web-based interface to that? Because I don't use the web interface at all, preferring to use traditional port 43 queries instead. On rare occasions when I want/need to show some Windows weenie something in the WHOIS, I *do* direct *them* to use the web based interface... because that's one hell of a lot simpler than trying to explain to them how to use telnet to port 43... but other than that, I never even use the web interface. So should I just vote "N/A" on that question, even though I am mostly happy with what I can get from the traditional port 43 interface? Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] What do you think of our new UI?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] What do you think of our new UI?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]