[db-wg] Bogon route object cleanup

I think the best option here would simply be to ask IANA (possibly through
the NRO) how these prefixes should be handled as I don't think we are
necessarily the correct people to answer these questions.

-Cynthia

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021, 12:01 Gert Doering via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 04:21:41PM +0300, Aleksi Suhonen via db-wg wrote:
> > People keep repeating that 6to4 and Teredo are deprecated technologies,
> > but they've obviously not read the deprecation RFCs themselves. The RFCs
> > clearly state that while new implementations and installations of these
> > tunneling methods are strongly discouraged, existing installations
> > should be allowed to function for the near future for backward
> > compatibility. So on these grounds I oppose removing those route objects
> > too.
>
> Now, how long is "near future"?
>
> > Yes, I run one instance of these services at AS29432, and would be
> > affected by this change.
>
> How much traffic to you see?
>
> We run a local 6to4 relay - not announced to "the Internet" - and I hardly
> see any traffic anymore.
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- NetMaster
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael
> Emmer
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20211008/9c13709b/attachment.html>