[db-wg] Route objects for space administered by other RIRs

is there a need for the ROA object to be identical in length to the route
object?

take 41.213.128.0/21 is a RIPE-NOAUTH route object
and there is a valid ROA from AFRINIC for 41.213.128.0/17 max length 24

regards
erik

On Wed, 12 May 2021 at 11:46, Edward Shryane <eshryane at ripe.net> wrote:

> Hi Erik,
>
> > On 12 May 2021, at 09:27, Erik Linder <erik.linder at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The proposed cleanup is to only remove route(6) objects from
> RIPE-NONAUTH which are not registered in *any* region:
> > too bad, because I have a use case where I have a couple of route
> objects in RIPE-NOAUTH but they are maintained by an old peering partner
> which seems to have no wish to help me remove those objects which are legit
> AFRINIC route objects. thus although I want to clean them, I can't.
> >
> > regards
> > Erik
>
> There is a RIPE policy to cleanup conflicting route(6) objects in the
> NONAUTH database:
> https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-731
>
> If you can create a ROA for the Afrinic prefix, a cleanup job will delete
> any conflicting route(6) for you.
>
> Regards
> Ed
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20210512/8b11a5e4/attachment.html>