This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Removal of bogon route objects
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Removal of bogon route objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Removal of bogon route objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Tue Jun 15 00:40:56 CEST 2021
Edward Shryane via db-wg wrote on 14/06/2021 15:16: > Thanks, that was my question, should we validate that*either* the IP > or AS is unregistered, or*both* IP and AS are unregistered (and you > indicated*either*). definitely if the prefix is unregistered. If there's a nonauth route object registered with a valid address range, but invalid AS, is it currently possible to update the route object to reference a correctly registered ASN? If the answer is that it's not possible (i.e. because the db primary key is a concatenation of the prefix + as), then the route object should be deleted because it's basically unfixable. If there are no immediate plans to investigate recently reregistered space, would it be worth running the invalid prefix analysis for all of the extended delegation files every month since 2018-09-04? The unallocated / reserved address pools change, and it should be easy enough to script this up. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Removal of bogon route objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Removal of bogon route objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]