This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] AFRINIC Audit report
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] AFRINIC Audit report
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] AFRINIC Audit report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Sat Jan 30 04:32:30 CET 2021
In message <CAKvLzuHHSGJ46RRD_-PKLPc-xzrSJuHc71RnpgSmi=w6JyyC2A at mail.gmail.com> denis walker <ripedenis at gmail.com> wrote: >Your post, Ronald, also has nothing to do with the RIPE Database. I disagree. AFRINIC has just completed a detailed historical audit of its entire WHOIS data base and has published the results derived therefrom. Will RIPE now follow suit? Or does RIPE consider itself to be somehow magically above the fray when it comes to possible data base hanky panky, either present or past? Let me ask the question a different way... Are there any persons who, once upon a time, worked inside RIPE NCC, had some authority with respect the the assignment of valuable IP address blocks, and who thence and thereafter when into "private practice" so to speak? Before making such broad and sweeping proclamations of irrelevance, Mr. Co-Chairman, perhaps it would behoove you to perform some relevant historical research, as I have done. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] AFRINIC Audit report
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] AFRINIC Audit report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]