This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 196.52.0.0/14 revoked, cleanup efforts needed
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Fwd: [anti-abuse-wg] 196.52.0.0/14 revoked, cleanup efforts needed
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 196.52.0.0/14 revoked, cleanup efforts needed
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Fri Jan 22 10:55:44 CET 2021
On 20 Jan 2021, at 22:27, Nick Hilliard via db-wg wrote: > Regarding cleanup of route: objects for this this (and other) > unregistered address space in the ripe irrdb, can this just be done? > Or is it necessary to create a policy to ask the NCC to do it? Creating a policy seems to me to be too heavy an approach in this case. I would think that a simple request from the DB WG to the NCC should be enough. If a greater degree of formality were considered necessary, a new NWI could be created. I hope this helps. Niall O’Reilly RIPE Vice-Chair
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Fwd: [anti-abuse-wg] 196.52.0.0/14 revoked, cleanup efforts needed
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 196.52.0.0/14 revoked, cleanup efforts needed
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]