This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Creating route objects without mnt on existing ones
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Creating route objects without mnt on existing ones
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Creating route objects without mnt on existing ones
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrick Velder
lists at velder.li
Fri Jan 15 15:38:13 CET 2021
Hi there Update: Max gave me the tip that it is possible to force delete the existing route objects & re-create them with the own maintainer. This way it works to add another route object :-) Best regards Patrick On 15.01.21 14:33, Patrick Velder wrote: > Hi there > > It seems to be impossible to create route objects for inet(6)nums, if > there are other route objects to which your maintainer has no access. > > Even if you have mnt-by + mnt-routes on the inet(6)nums. > > Due to that, it's much more difficult to create new route objects for > our customers, as we have to contact the maintainer of all existing > objects in order to get mnt-by/mnt-routes on their route objects. > > In my opinion, that makes zero sense. If you have mnt-by/mnt-routes on > an inetnum, you should be able to create objects, regardless of > existing ones. > > Best regards > Patrick >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Creating route objects without mnt on existing ones
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Creating route objects without mnt on existing ones
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]