[db-wg] proposal: new attribute 'geofeed:'

Would it make sense to wait with implementation until the the ietf draft
comes out of draft status? Seems like jumping into beta waters to me.

Agoston

On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 8:22 PM Randy Bush via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote:

> hi cynthia
>
> >> Why not use the RPKI to distribute geofeed information?
> >
> > I think using RPKI for this will make it needlessly complicated for
> people
> > to use. I think we want to make this as simple as possible for someone to
> > find.
>
> as i said to job over on the dark side of the force, the ietf,
>
>     hammer seeks nails, eh?  :)
>
>     geoseekers already mine whois.  so we are putting the keys under the
>     streetlight (excuse what may be an american-only idiom).
>
>     asking someone who wants to publish their geofeed location to first
> deal
>     with rpki is an artifical barrier to deployment.
>
>     asking someone who wants to find geofeed data to first deal with rpki
> is
>     an artificial barrier to deployment.
>
>     is the rpki to be the next dns/bgp, a place to dump data?
>
> have we all looked at
>
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds/
>
> it's all pretty much layed out there, i hope.  improvements solicited,
> of course.
>
> randy
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20210106/61493874/attachment.html>