[db-wg] proposal: new attribute 'geofeed:'

>> from draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds
>> 
>> 	Any particular inetnum: object MAY have, at most, one geofeed
>> 	reference, whether a remarks: or a proper geofeed: attribute when
>> 	one is defined.
>> 
>> now all we need is for the someone or someone's automated system to read
>> the spec :)
> 
> Of course the question is "what should happen in the bad case", eg.
> what's the expected behaviour if there are 2 or more "remarks:
> geofeed" attributes?
> 
> Should the DB reject such an update? Should the geofeed client pick
> one at random? Should it pick the first one? Or the last one? Or none?

my personal opinion would be, as the spec says only one, an attempt to
add a second should fail.  as should an initial attempt to create with
more than one.

but i have faith that we can make it more complicated :)

randy