This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Smallest IPv4 allocation size (in the RIPE region)?
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Smallest IPv4 allocation size (in the RIPE region)?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Corrected LIR Organisation "address:" Attribute Values
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elad Cohen
elad at netstyle.io
Wed Aug 18 19:19:15 CEST 2021
+1 Porland ________________________________ From: db-wg <db-wg-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 7:12 PM To: db-wg at ripe.net <db-wg at ripe.net> Subject: Re: [db-wg] Smallest IPv4 allocation size (in the RIPE region)? In message <b8561871-ae0d-c4ce-93c5-7e2e6758db76 at foobar.org>, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote: >Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg wrote on 18/08/2021 13:35: >> Regardless of the exact status, I remain perplexed to see blocks with >> prefix lengths greater than /24 in the daily RIPE stats file. > >not sure why you're perplexed? They're legitimate assignments. The >public DFZ isn't the only game in town. Good point! Thank you Nick. Regards, rfg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20210818/228e929d/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Smallest IPv4 allocation size (in the RIPE region)?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Corrected LIR Organisation "address:" Attribute Values
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]