This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Smallest IPv4 allocation size (in the RIPE region)?
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Smallest IPv4 allocation size (in the RIPE region)?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Smallest IPv4 allocation size (in the RIPE region)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Wed Aug 18 14:35:01 CEST 2021
In message <20210818091626.GA1867 at hydra.ck.polsl.pl>, Piotr Strzyzewski <Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl> wrote: >On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 01:00:24AM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg wrote: > >> I have thus been surprised to see the following blocks listed separately >> as "allocated" in the daily "stats" file for RIPE. > >I have checked first few entries from the list below in >ftp://ftp.ripe.net:/pub/stats/ripencc/delegated-ripencc-latest and it >looks like these are assigned and not allocated. What stats are you >referring to? My apologies. A mere slip of the tongue on my part. I had intended to say "assigned"... not "allocated". >> 91.227.79.0/25 ripe >> 91.227.79.128/25 ripe > >ripencc|RU|ipv4|91.227.79.0|128|20110509|assigned >ripencc|RU|ipv4|91.227.79.128|128|20110915|assigned Regardless of the exact status, I remain perplexed to see blocks with prefix lengths greater than /24 in the daily RIPE stats file. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Smallest IPv4 allocation size (in the RIPE region)?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Smallest IPv4 allocation size (in the RIPE region)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]