This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] RIPE Database - PERSON Objects
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE Database requirements progress
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE Database - Historical Information
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bijal Sanghani
bijal at euro-ix.net
Wed Apr 14 15:08:54 CEST 2021
Dear colleagues, As part of our work in the RIPE Database Requirements Task Force (DBTF), we are trying to understand where there is a requirement to keep allowing PERSON objects to be created. We have received arguments for both pro and against this and we propose the following recommendation: promote ROLE objects instead of PERSON objects but still make it possible for users to create PERSON objects. We want to recommend the RIPE NCC to implement stricter checks and measures to prevent users from unknowingly entering personal data in both object types. We are looking specifically for arguments pro or against this recommendation. We’ll then discuss each argument with the task force and make a decision. Kind regards, Bijal on behalf of the DBTF -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20210414/a52e425e/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE Database requirements progress
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE Database - Historical Information
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]