This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] New NWI for geofeed?
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] New NWI for geofeed?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] New NWI for geofeed?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Apr 6 19:23:37 CEST 2021
> I have CCed Randy Bush as I thought he might be able to clarify what > was meant by the following: >> To minimize the load on RIR whois [RFC3912] services, use of the >> RIR's FTP [RFC0959] services SHOULD be the preferred access. This >> also provides bulk access instead of fetching with a tweezers. > > I think one of the most important things in general here is seeing > what is within the scope of the db-wg to decide and what should > probably be defined by the IETF spec. > And also to try to get some kind of implementation out as quickly as > possible while still doing it properly. > Because as you mention, the remarks format appears to be used quite a > bit and I imagine it probably grows in use at a decent rate. (I have > no data to back this up though, it is just a guess) massimo is more aware of the details of current deployment and how that affects the rirs. i suspect the load of the remarks: versions would be the same as that of geofeed:. the suggestion to use bulk fetch as opposed to object-by-object seems simple and the benefits should be pretty obvious i would think. see msssimo's existing tooling (cited in the internet-draft) for implementation.>> -The IETF doc 'Finding geofeeds' says "To minimize the load on RIR >> whois [RFC3912] services, use of the RIR's FTP [RFC0959] services >> SHOULD be the preferred access." Is the RIPE NCC expected to download >> all the geofeed files and make them available through their FTP >> service? > > I don't quite interpret it like that, I rather interpret it as the > RIPE NCC (and other RIRs) publishing a list of all prefixes and their > geofeed URL. > I imagine it like the delegated file, but just prefixes and geofeed URLs. > > But I will say it seems a bit unclear, maybe Randy Bush or one of the > other authors could comment on the intention here. again, see the actual implementation referenced in the internet-draft > For access via WHOIS, I would say no as that would probably be way too > complicated. yep >> The IETF doc 'Finding geofeeds': >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds/ randy --- randy at psg.com `gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd randy at psg.com` signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header butchery
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] New NWI for geofeed?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] New NWI for geofeed?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]