This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Interest to continue NWI-9
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Interest to continue NWI-9
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Interest to continue NWI-9
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
denis walker
ripedenis at gmail.com
Sun Nov 8 23:30:03 CET 2020
Hi All As Job said it is at an early discussion stage. If we do this using the NWI mechanism then the Problem statement and then a Solution definition will be discussed on the mailing list by anyone with an interest in this issue. Someone has to put forward a first draft for discussion. Once these are agreed, we have three options: A-The RIPE NCC does the design and implementation B-A small group (Task Force?) of community people, with the RIPE NCC, does the design and implementation C-We have design by committee on the mailing list Let's discuss the problem and solution ideas and then most likely option B is the way to move forward. cheers denis co-chair DB-WG On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 at 16:00, Job Snijders via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > Hi Cynthia, > > The NRTM v4 initiative is in an awkward early stage where various > parties (with *no* obligations towards each other!) are attempting to > set the stage for the future existence of an inter-operable successor to > the NRTM v3 protocol. > > As indicated before, the nature of this call was informal, akin to a > hallway meeting at a conference. Decisions about the RIPE NCC database > are made on the db-wg at ipe.net mailing list. It was a courtesy to this > group to indicate some volunteers would have a call to help progress > things. You too were free to join. Hallway meetings are not recorded. > > I'm interested to hear your opinions on-list or off-list! :-) > > Kind regards, > > Job > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 10:36:43AM +0100, Cynthia Revström wrote: > > I would like to see more here on the mailing list, so I would request that > > any future calls be recorded and published. > > > > I have opinions on this subject and I don't think me missing the call > > should leave me out of the loop. > > > > - Cynthia > > > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2020, 11:31 Stavros Konstantaras < > > stavros.konstantaras at ams-ix.net> wrote: > > > > > Hi Cynthia, > > > > > > Yes the call happened and the problem description is almost ready. Soon > > > will be published here in the mailing list so the DB-WG chairs can > > > officially create a new NWI and submit it to RIPE NCC developers > > > > > > Thank you for your support and your interest on that :) > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Stavros Konstantaras | Sr. Network Engineer | AMS-IX > > > M +31 (0) 620 89 51 04 | T +31 20 305 8999 > > > ams-ix.net > > > > > > On 6 Nov 2020, at 02:51, Cynthia Revström via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> > > > wrote: > > > > > > I also support creating a new NWI for a modernized NRTM like service. > > > > > > - Cynthia > > > > > > On Fri, 6 Nov 2020, 02:50 Cynthia Revström, <me at cynthia.re> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Job, > > >> > > >> Was there a call about this yet? > > >> > > >> And if so, was there any outcome? > > >> > > >> - Cynthia > > >> > > >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2020, 20:38 Job Snijders via db-wg, <db-wg at ripe.net> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:30:28PM +0100, denis walker wrote: > > >>> > I would suggest we create NWI-12 to move forward with a new version of > > >>> > NRTM. Perhaps you could write the first draft of the problem > > >>> > statement? > > >>> > > >>> Given that more people than just myself were engaged with this subject > > >>> so far... maybe Stavros, Emil, a DB-WG chair, myself and any other > > >>> interested parties can have a 1 hour group phone call to formulate an > > >>> updated problem statement for NWI-12? > > >>> > > >>> Perhaps next week, November 4th, 15:00 UTC? Consider it a "hallway > > >>> chat", not something formal. The chairs can report back to the mailing > > >>> list. > > >>> > > >>> Kind regards, > > >>> > > >>> Job > > >>> > > >>> > > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Interest to continue NWI-9
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Interest to continue NWI-9
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]