This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] RIPE DB Route Object fails creation
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE DB Route Object fails creation
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE DB Route Object fails creation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk
ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Jun 11 21:21:37 CEST 2020
Hi Rob
RFC2725 only defines the mechanism, which we already know as it still works this way (except for the ASN authorisation). But it does not explain 'why' it is done this way. That was probably discussed in the process of writing RFC2725 :)
cheersdenis
co-chair DB-WG
On Thursday, 11 June 2020, 19:08:16 CEST, Rob Evans via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote:
> Denis, do you remember *why* that is the rule?
RFC2725, section 9.9.
He says, retiring to a safe distance... :)
Cheers,
Rob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20200611/3ae13e25/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE DB Route Object fails creation
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE DB Route Object fails creation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]