This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] Puny code or UTF-8 (or both)?

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Puny code or UTF-8 (or both)?
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Puny code or UTF-8 (or both)?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Peter Koch pk at DENIC.DE
Mon Jul 13 15:03:33 CEST 2020

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:12:42PM +0000, ripedenis--- via db-wg wrote:

> Do we therefore have support to introduce Puny code now and then consider how to move forward with UTF-8?

I'm not sure I understand the proposal. "punycode" is primarily IDNA2003
speak - and the initial suggestion by Ed was to apply an automatic
conversion.  How would that system deal with conversion failures
and/or with ambiguities between IDNA2003 and IDNA2008?

-Peter

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Puny code or UTF-8 (or both)?
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Puny code or UTF-8 (or both)?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]