This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] RPSL requirements in aut-num objects

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] RPSL requirements in aut-num objects
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RPSL requirements in aut-num objects

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Nick Hilliard nick at foobar.org
Thu Jul 2 19:50:58 CEST 2020

Tom Hill via db-wg wrote on 02/07/2020 18:32:
> In the case of (i), who in their right mind expects that data to be
> accurate?

the last time I looked at this (preso in ripe59, routing-wg) there was 
no discernible relationship between rpsl and what was appearing in the 
dfz, i.e. r looked like it was nearly 0.  When there is such a serious 
disconnect between two data sets, it's time to question whether it's 
worth maintaining the data sets.

Nick

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] RPSL requirements in aut-num objects
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RPSL requirements in aut-num objects

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]