This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] API keys for database maintenance
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] API keys for database maintenance
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] API keys for database maintenance
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Fri Feb 21 13:10:56 CET 2020
Hi Tore, But it does have something very similar, md5-pw and I really don't see why this is not adequate. Just generate a 64 character hex string put it as a password and boom you have an API key. My question is, how would having a dedicated API key feature help? - Cynthia On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 1:08 PM Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no> wrote: > Hello Cynthia, > > > I really do not see any benefits or reasons why we should change the API > key system for the DB. > > Maybe I am missing something that you can elaborate on. > > «An API key system for the DB» does not exist today. > > I do not propose to change this non-existent system. I propose to create > one. > > > Additionally if this was to replace the existing system it would just > make it unavailable for non-LIRs (such as orgs with PI resources) without > any real reason. > > I do not propose to replace any authentication or authorisation method > that already exists today. > > Tore > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20200221/03347c68/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] API keys for database maintenance
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] API keys for database maintenance
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]