[db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10

This is not my point, yes I could easily ask them to fix my specific case.

My point is that I very much doubt I am the only one who has this issue,
and I only noticed it as I was looking on bgp.he.net and noticed the GB
flag.

- Cynthia


On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:48 PM Matthias Merkel <matthias.merkel at staclar.com>
wrote:

> Hi Cynthia,
>
> ORG-ISSA10-RIPE is your LIR, right? It does indeed look like it should
> have a country attribute of Sweden. Did you ask the NCC about this already?
> Did they mention any reason for it being GB?
>
> Matthias Merkel
> Staclar, Inc.
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Cynthia Revström <me at cynthia.re>
> *Sent:* Monday, December 7, 2020 2:40 PM
> *To:* Matthias Merkel <matthias.merkel at staclar.com>
> *Cc:* db-wg at ripe.net <db-wg at ripe.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Well before NWI-10 there was no proper definition, but there is now a
> definition, and as a result the RIPE NCC updated the resources to GB
> whereas the LIR is quite obviously SE.
>
> - Cynthia
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:16 PM Matthias Merkel <
> matthias.merkel at staclar.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Cynthia,
>
>
>
> Could you please elaborate on why the data is now invalid (what you think
> it is supposed to be, what it is now and what situation is causing it to be
> this way)? My understanding is that there was never a “proper” definition
> of the country field.
>
>
>
> Matthias Merkel
>
> Staclar, Inc.
>
>
>
> *From:* db-wg <db-wg-bounces at ripe.net> *On Behalf Of *Cynthia Revström
> via db-wg
> *Sent:* Monday, 7 December 2020 14:04
> *To:* DB-WG <db-wg at ripe.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10
>
>
>
> To clarify, when I said "messed up the data on my resources" I meant that
> the delegated file now has invalid data.
>
> And invalid data that is supposed to be correct is a lot worse than
> incorrect data that is just provided by the resource holder.
>
>
> - Cynthia
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:58 PM Cynthia Revström <me at cynthia.re> wrote:
>
> Apologies if this email is a bit impolite.
>
>
>
> From the start NWI-10 seemed like a pointless policy to me and just a
> policy that was made because the db-wg wanted to make more policies.
>
>
>
> But as it has already messed up the data on my resources, I see it as a
> policy that messes up data and wastes time for no real advantage.
>
>
>
> Hence I suggest that we revert NWI-10 unless someone actually has a good
> reason for why the legal address needs to match the delegated file, and how
> to implement it in a non-messy way.
>
>
>
> - Cynthia
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20201207/3aa1315d/attachment.html>