This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Historical records... what is and isn't available
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Historical records... what is and isn't available
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Wed Dec 2 23:25:14 CET 2020
I bumped my head on something unexpected a day or two ago, and I would now just like to ask a question, to find out if what I seemed to see was just a product of my own programming mistake, or if it is fact the way things were intended to be. So, true or false? The --list-versions and --show-version options are not supported for person:, role:, and mntner: records. To be clear I am *not* asking if the data returned when the --show-version option is applied to one of the types of records I've just listed is merely redacted of all personal information relating to natural persons. Rather, I am asking if I should in fact be expecting to get absolutely -nothing- back when/if I try to use --show-version on any of the aforementioned record types, regadless of of whether the requested historical information contains 100% personal information or alternatively, if it contains 0% personal information, or anything in between. Regards, rfg
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Historical records... what is and isn't available
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]