[db-wg] Suggestion further validity-checking

Hi Jens,

Can you share the exact example? I'd like to understand what type of
data validity error your are pointing to.

Kind regards,

Job

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:08 PM Jens Ott - Opteamax GmbH via db-wg
<db-wg at ripe.net> wrote:
>
> Dear DB-WG,
>
> I am newly subscribed to this mailing-list although I am already active
> in RIPE-community for quite some time. Some of you might know me in person.
>
> To be honest, I am not sure if this is the right place to send my mail
> to and if it's not I'd be happy to be told who to address better.
>
> For debugging our prefix-list-generator I increased verbosity of the
> tool a little. As side-effekt I was also pointed to a route-object in
> the ripe-database which contains a "hole"-definition where the netmask
> doesn't match (X.Y.226.0/21) and actually is the same size as the entire
> route-object.
>
> I already contacted the maintainer of that object but think it might be
> a good idea to add a validity-check on adding new objects to prevent
> this kind of faulty objects in the DB.
>
> Best regards
> --
> Jens Ott
> Geschäftsführer
>
> Opteamax GmbH
>
> Simrockstr. 4b
> 53619 Rheinbreitbach
>
> Tel.:  +49 2224 969500
> Fax:   +49 2224 97691059
> Email: jo at opteamax.de
>
> HRB: 23144, Amtsgericht Montabaur
> Geschäftsführer: Jens Ott
> Umsatzsteuer-ID.: DE264133989
>