This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] --list-versions

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] --list-versions

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Piotr Strzyzewski Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Wed Jun 26 08:32:31 CEST 2019

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:47:11AM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg wrote:
> >b) ??netname objects?? don't exist, so no, not supposed to work.
> 
> That comment makes no sense however.  Those objects -do- exist in the

No, they don't. Look into the documentation, please. Alternatively try
'whois -q types'.

> data base and a normal WHOIS query finds them.  So I'm really still

Because they are lookup keys. Look into the documentation, please.
$ whois -t inetnum|grep netname
netname:        [mandatory]  [single]     [lookup key]

> not clear on why I can't apply --list-versions and --show-version to
> them.

Piotr

-- 
Piotr Strzyżewski
Silesian University of Technology, Computer Centre
Gliwice, Poland

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] --list-versions

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]