This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] --list-versions

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] --list-versions
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] --list-versions

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ronald F. Guilmette rfg at tristatelogic.com
Wed Jun 26 00:20:41 CEST 2019

In message <CAKw1M3NXXAFLZrRTehzu5SFYiNCABg4vdKQPXgf_As5+vTOOdw at mail.gmail.com>, 
=?UTF-8?Q?Cynthia_Revstr=C3=B6m?= <me at cynthia.re> wrote:

>I would assume that is because for some reason netname is not unique,
>If you run
>whois -h whois.ripe.net CYNTHIA-V6-TEST -r
>You can see my point, 2 inet6num with the same netname.

I understand that a netname can (and often does) correlate to multiple
IP address blocks.  That fact, by itself, does not clarify why it
would either be difficult or impossible to provide the --list-versions
and --show-version functionality for netnames.

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] --list-versions
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] --list-versions

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]