This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] ORG record vetting ?

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ronald F. Guilmette rfg at tristatelogic.com
Mon Jul 29 19:52:42 CEST 2019

In message <20190729064352.GB31298 at hydra.ck.polsl.pl>, 
Piotr Strzyzewski <Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl> wrote:

>In the context of RIPE DB one should not forget about aut-num's with
>either OTHER or LEGACY status or with the RIPE-NONAUTH source. Only
>around 10% of the latter do have organisation object linked. Those ones
>were most likely never vetted.

ACK

My questions were only about "normal" recent stuff, not LEGACY or OTHER.


Regards,
rfg

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]