This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Mon Jul 29 13:02:45 CEST 2019
Hi (please see inline) On Mon, 29 Jul 2019, Nick Hilliard via db-wg wrote: > Jacob Slater via db-wg wrote on 29/07/2019 06:25: (...) >> Do you have a suggestion for how the process could be improved? Perhaps excluding jurisdictions *outside* the RIPE NCC service region, where company related data *can't* be verified by the RIPE NCC. > Would it be feasible for the RIPE NCC to add a read-only record to org: > objects which provided the date of the last due diligence check? E.g. > something like > > organisation: ORG-FNL99-RIPE > org-name: Foo Networks Limited > org-type: LIR > [...] > mnt-ref: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT > mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT > abuse-c: FOO2000-RIPE > created: 2019-01-01T01:01:01Z > last-modified: 2019-01-01T01:01:01Z > due-diligence: 2019-07-01T12:00:00Z > source: RIPE > > Otherwise it doesn't look like it's easy to heuristically work out whether > due diligence has been carried out on a particular object or not. If this is feasible, it really sounds like a good idea to me! Cheers, Carlos > Nick >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]