This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Idea: magic mntner for all LIR contacts
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Idea: magic mntner for all LIR contacts
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Idea: magic mntner for all LIR contacts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Mon Jan 7 11:53:58 CET 2019
I think the point of this maintainer issue was that if you removed someone from the LIR auth list, they would also get removed from the DB maintainer. I don't think that SSO-LIR should be the standard, but it should be an option in my opinion. Because while what you are describing could be an issue, I think it could be a bigger issue to forget to remove someone from the SSO in the maintainer. Kind regards, Cynthia Revström On 2019-01-07 11:48, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Cynthia Revström via db-wg wrote on 07/01/2019 10:27: >> I think the current main suggestion is to add a new DB auth scheme, >> such as "auth: SSO-LIR no.foobar" that includes all the SSO accounts >> linked to the LIR except for Billing accounts. > > Denis is just pointing out that it may not be advisable to statically > tie this into a potentially inflexible mechanism like the main LIR > authentication list. You can be guaranteed that if this were done, > someone would come along with a credible reason to have a LIR account > with admin control over portal stuff, but not direct DB control of a > specific object or set of objects. > > One possible option to work around this limitation would be to create > a new db object type, "sso-set", which could contain a list of SSO > account names, e.g.: > > sso-set: FOOBAR1-RIPE > descr: List of SSO tokens for no.foobar > members: foo at example.com > members: bar at example.org > mnt-by: TBD1-RIPE > source: RIPE > > Each LIR would be able to define sso-sets with arbitrary contents and > tie them to objects, e.g. like this: > > auth: SSO-SET FOOBAR1-RIPE > > There would need to be some thought put into how to handle mnt-by: for > the sso-set object (quis custodiet ipsos custodes)? > > Nick >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Idea: magic mntner for all LIR contacts
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Idea: magic mntner for all LIR contacts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]