This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Certain sponsored? ASNs without sponsoring-org
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Certain sponsored? ASNs without sponsoring-org
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Certain sponsored? ASNs without sponsoring-org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Mon Jan 7 11:04:07 CET 2019
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:57:47AM +0100, Cynthia Revström via db-wg wrote: Cynthia, > So I have now run across several ASNs in which the org is of type "OTHER" > yet there is no sponsoring-org, could this please be clarified? > > Example ASNs: AS200358, AS204842 > > If it is like I think it is, it must be that they have lost their sponsors > but if that is the case, I would like to see a remark that is an "RIPE NCC > managed value" saying something like "This ASN does not have any sponsor > since YYYY-MM-DD". > > I am not entirely sure on this but something to clarify what is going on. Please read https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-management/faq/independent-resources/phase-three/what-is-a-sponsoring-lir If the resource (ASN) is used by the LIR itself, there is no need to put any sponsoring-org since there is no sponsoring LIR for such resource. Piotr -- Piotr Strzyżewski Silesian University of Technology, Computer Centre Gliwice, Poland
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Certain sponsored? ASNs without sponsoring-org
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Certain sponsored? ASNs without sponsoring-org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]