This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Idea: magic mntner for all LIR contacts
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Idea: magic mntner for all LIR contacts
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Idea: magic mntner for all LIR contacts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Mon Jan 7 09:35:30 CET 2019
Just want to put my 2 cents in, I do think that something like SSO <reg id> would be good but probably another DB auth scheme, like this: auth: SSO-LIR no.foobar I prefer this so that it is just clear that it is a different thing. Kind regards, Cynthia Revström On 2019-01-07 09:31, Tore Anderson via db-wg wrote: > * Aleksi Suhonen > >> On 03/12/2018 10:35, Tore Anderson via db-wg wrote: >>> So I was thinking: is this mandatory and error-prone duplication of work >>> really necessary? Wouldn't it be possible to instead have some kind of >>> magic mntner object that is is kept automatically up to date with «auth: >>> SSO»-attributes for all the LIR user accounts? >> I second this idea. Perhaps this should be a different object type tho, to make it clear that editing the magic maintainer by hand will have undesired results. It should be interchangeable with normal maintainers of course, a bit like person objects and role objects are. > Or maybe just expand the existing SSO attribute to accept a RegID. For > example: > > mntner: FOOBAR-MNT > auth: SSO no.foobar > > Which would allow maintenance by all registered user accounts in LIR > no.foobar (except for accounts with the «billing» privilege level). > >> Do you want someone to co-author a PDP on this? > I was hoping that a PDP wouldn't be necessary, to be honest. That is, if > the NCC thought it was a good idea they could just go ahead and implement > it. (If I recall correctly, the «auth: SSO» functionality was added > without there being a community policy demanding it.) > > That said, if you want to write a proposal to this effect I'd be happy to > put my name on it. > > Tore >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Idea: magic mntner for all LIR contacts
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Idea: magic mntner for all LIR contacts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]