[db-wg] No more personal objects in the RIPE Database?

Hey Hans,

thanks for following up on this.

Before we start working on this, is a policy proposal really needed? I'm 
not sure which policy proposal should be updated.

I would be happy to make a policy proposal - I will need your help or 
Marco's.

@Denis - do you want to co-author?

Elvis

On 2/22/19 06:40, Hans Petter Holen via db-wg wrote:
>
> Following Denis’s presentation at the last database working group 
> meeting and Elvis’s messages to the RIPE NCC members list I think it 
> is time to have a new discussion on the need for personal objects in 
> the RIPE Database.
>
> https://ripe77.ripe.net/presentations/63-PERSONobjects.pdfhttps://ripe77.ripe.net/archives/video/2298/https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/2019-February/003295.html
>
>
> This is not questioning previous legal assessments of GDPR compliance, 
> but taking a step back and looking at how would we do this if we were 
> to design the RIPE Database with today's privacy requirements in mind.
>
>
> The ccTLD for .NO, Norid made an update to their service last year to 
> completely remove person objects from their database. 
> https://www.norid.no/uploads/2017/12/Datamodell-revidert-en-v2.pdf
>
>
> In terms of the RIPE Database, that would mean that resources would 
> refer to organisational objects and roles, not to personal objects.
>
>
> Perhaps Denis and/or Elvis would propose a policy change in this respect?
>
>
> Hans Petter
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20190222/3b3f5119/attachment.html>