This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[db-wg] ORG record vetting ?

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ronald F. Guilmette rfg at tristatelogic.com
Thu Aug 1 03:59:32 CEST 2019

In message <CAFV686cfOKP_FseWgFhV2CnHr3pgf-eS36BVXfXfZpn0eKpRjA at mail.gmail.com>
Jacob Slater <jacob at rezero.org> wrote:

>'OTHER' objects which receive direct assignments from the NCC (PI IP space
>or ASNs) are still subjected to due diligence checks (though only at the
>time of assignment).

Just curious.... Is that rule written down anyplace where I could look
at it?

Is it in some published procedure or policy manual someplace?

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]