[db-wg] ORG record vetting ?

 HI Nick
The ORGANISATION object has an "org-type:"  attribute. Most ORGANISATION objects have a value of either 'LIR' or 'OTHER'. If it is 'LIR' that ORGANISATION object was created by the RIPE NCC for a resource holder and has been through the due diligence process. If it is type 'OTHER' it was not created by the RIPE NCC and will not have been subjected to any due diligence checks by the RIPE NCC. So I think the 'binary flag' you suggested already exists.
cheersdenis
co-chair DB-WG

    On Monday, 29 July 2019, 19:40:47 CEST, Nick Hilliard via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote:  
 
 >> There are ways of flagging whether this process was carried out. One
>> option would be to use a binary flag. Another would be to implement a
>> datestamp for the last due diligence process carried out if it's not
>> been set by the NCC.  Lack of data could be flagged by either the
>> absence of the parameter or else use 0000-00-00T00:00:00Z.
 >
> less sure here.  i can see wanting to differentiate between the two
> classes of objects.  not sure i care when they were last separated.
> unless you expect things to change in time.

if you have a better suggestion, go for it. My concern is mainly about 
having a deterministic way of figuring out which org objects have been 
subjected to due diligence and which haven't.

Nick

  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20190801/ab66def6/attachment.html>