[db-wg] PERSON objects in the RIPE Database

Hello,

My point was with the maintainer pair creation as I don't see a reason 
to give up personal information in the first place.

Kind Regards,
Cynthia Revström

On 2018-09-21 18:38, Daniel Suchy via db-wg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 9/21/18 5:00 PM, Cynthia Revström via db-wg wrote:
>> This really made me consider it, and I can't really see a valid reason
>> to require person objects to create a maintainer for example.
> You can use ROLE object instead of PERSON for maintaner creation (and of
> course for every object, where you can reference person object). Person
> is *not* required.
>
> Well, currently is not possible to create role-maintainer pair like
> person-maintainer with webuptates, but this isn't hard to implement I
> think. But you can easily workaround this by creating person-maintainer
> pair, then creating role, update maintainer and deleting (temporary)
> person object.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel
>