[db-wg] comment on comment at mic: database "purpose" vs not-globally-routed prefixes

I agree with Sandra.

Some prefixes are only used in very local scope (many IXP peering lan
prefixes for example), there still needs to be contact data

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Sandra Murphy via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote:
> (Sorry about this.  typed the comment into the chat window, hit submit, got “disconnected” error, reconnected, but too late to comment.)
>
> The comment at the mic was that there are many IP prefix resources in the database that are not globally routed, and that those objects were not part of the RIPE database purpose as stated. So collection of personal data for those objects could not rely on the RIPE database purpose for justification.
>
> I disagree that the lack of current global routing for an IP prefix means the RIPE database purpose of facilitating coordination does not apply.
>
> An allocated prefix can be globally announced at any time.  So there’s a need to have the data, anyway.
>
> In the current state of routing security, an allocated prefix can be globally announced at any time, not necessarily by the legitimate prefix holder.  We’ve seen several examples of some ISP announcing a prefix that seemed not to be in use, sometimes even registering a route object for the announcement, and using that prefix for some unfriendly purpose.  So there is still a need to have contact data for a prefix even before the legitimate prefix holder decides to globally announce the prefix.
>
> —Sandy
>
>
>