This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] usage of LIR-PARTITIONED status
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] usage of LIR-PARTITIONED status
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] usage of LIR-PARTITIONED status
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Dec 19 20:38:05 CET 2018
Hi, On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 03:51:20PM +0100, Alexander Stranzky via db-wg wrote: > recently I stumbled upon some less-used status of the INETNUM object, > namely LIR-PARTITIONED PA & LIR-PARTITIONED PI. Since there is no > difference in the docs > (https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/db/support/documentation/ripe-database-documentation/rpsl-object-types/4-2-descriptions-of-primary-objects/4-2-4-description-of-the-inetnum-object), > can anyone tell me when to use PA and when PI? If you partition a PA block, the result is PA. If you partition a PI block, the result is PI. (Though I wonder if "LIR-PARTITIONED PI" is actually a real thing, and strictly speaking the documentation quoted *can not* be correct, because you can't partition "an allocation" into "PI") More verbose explanation on these values is here: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2001-September/001732.html Section "Functionality". (And "oh my god was this long ago") Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20181219/7c0563dc/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] usage of LIR-PARTITIONED status
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] usage of LIR-PARTITIONED status
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]