This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] new NWI? - was: mntner object updates by mail
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] new NWI? - was: mntner object updates by mail
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
George Michaelson
ggm at algebras.org
Fri Oct 27 01:52:01 CEST 2017
I also would like the work to deprecate ASN auth for ROUTE creation, and the associated foreign object tagging to distinct source: work to be a discrete item (or pair of items) and not "glommed" into a collection of other things. Because there are two other RIR who run variants of the RIPE-NCC code, we have downstream consequential issues in the integration of patches into our own codebase (we're forked. it turned out to be too hard to maintain a single code tree) and its simpler if this stuff is done logistically in smaller tractable chunks. cheers -george On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:16 PM, den is via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > Hi Job > > Good point and I agree. > > cheers > denis > co-chair DB WG > > On 25 October 2017 at 14:13, Job Snijders <job at instituut.net> wrote: >> Dear Denis, >> >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:08 PM, den is via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: >>> Putting together several points from today: >>> >>> -dropping ASN auth for ROUTE creation >>> -wanting to know as precisely as possible who made a change >>> -updating MNTNER objects by email >>> -previous discussions on personal auth (which was also mentioned today) >>> >>> maybe we could do a wider review on the auth model and build all these >>> points into it...just a thought... >> >> >> While I appreciate any efforts to improve both security and the >> end-user experience, I do not see the need to lump "deprecate ASN auth >> for ROUTE creation" is a broader project and thereby risking that >> it'll never get done. It is a concise, incremental change in the model >> and we should treat it as such. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Job >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] new NWI? - was: mntner object updates by mail
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]