[db-wg] Proxy proposal large communities

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:12:11PM +1030, Mark Prior wrote:
> 1. Are you planning on doing that via a script or by eye-balling the policy?

eyeballing does not scale

> 2. How useful is that if their export policy is
> 	announce { 0.0.0.0/0^0-24 } and community.contains(something)?
>    Do you hunt for the import policies where community "something" is set?

We look for "which ASes are they going to announce, and which routes 
originate by those".  

This fine-grained crap is something we ignore anyway (so, a tool that
parses this and warns about non-understood extentions is ok, a tool
that errors out is not helpful).

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20171114/3922ca18/attachment.sig>