[db-wg] changes to the implementation of "abuse-c:"

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:43:06PM +0000, ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk wrote:

Denis, Colleagues,

> It is currently not possible to specify alternative abuse contacts for different resources in the RIPE Database held by different parts of the same organisation.

Agree.

> It is currently not reasonably possible to specify alternative abuse contacts for resources in the RIPE Database assigned to organisations other than the parent organisation. In many circumstances these organisations are customers of the parent organisation. The lower organisation wishes to handle the abuse separate from the parent organisation.

Would you be so kind and elaborate more about "(...) not reasonably
possible (...)". Do I understand correctly that putting proper ROLE
object in abuse-c attribute of ORGANISATION object is beyond reasonable
possibility?

> 
> After the introduction of "abuse-c", the "abuse-mailbox:" attribute in the PERSON, MNTNER, ORGANISATION and IRT objects was intended to be deprecated. This cleanup was never done and the old data causes confusion to users manually searching the database. 

Agree.

Piotr

-- 
gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski
E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl