[db-wg] More-specific abuse-c

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 10:53:35AM +0100, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> I would propose to fix this and add an abuse-c to resource objects
> that would be "more specific" than the org abuse-c and overrides it.

Please!

The need to add extra org objects just to delegate abuse handling to
other teams for specific networks has annoyed me from day one of abuse-c:,
to the extent that I've just not done so.

To repeat that: the current approach is so annoying that people that
are *willing* to provide better abuse contact data shy away from doing so,
because "why bother".

Gert Doering
        -- speaking as a LIR tech-c and abuse-c
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20161102/ee33b7e0/attachment.sig>