This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] NWI-2 - displaying history for DB objects where available
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] NWI-2 - displaying history for DB objects where available
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] NWI-3 - AFRINIC IRR Homing
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
denis
ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk
Wed May 25 22:37:02 CEST 2016
On 25/05/2016 22:18, denis wrote: > Hi Sascha > > On 25/05/2016 22:48, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 02:57:15PM +0200, Job Snijders wrote: >>> --------- >>> NWI-2: >> >>> However, it is not entirely clear to the RIPE NCC why this is >>> useful. We also have some concerns, mainly non-technical, and >>> therefore we believe that the problem statement and motivation needs >>> to be better defined in the working group. >> >> Indeed, I should like to see some use cases that go beyond simple >> curiosity or "intelligence collection". >> >> Also, how does this affect objects referred to by the >> "historical" objects? Does this mean that a deleted personal or >> organisational object will now have to be retrievable forever for >> historical purposes? Does a "right to be forgotten" exist for >> ripedb entries? > > The current implementation does not show history of personal data. Apart > from the legal issues, it is technically not possible to provide > reliable personal history because of the way Nic-handles were reused in > the past. > > You cannot query for a MNTNER object so history is also not available > for those objects. Not sure if history of ORGANISATION objects is > allowed now, but personally I don't think that should be available to > anyone outside of the organisation. Actually I can think of a number of issues relating to the history of an ORGANISATION object. So I will wait to see what use cases are put forward for any history before I comment more on that. cheers denis > > cheers > denis > >> >> rgds, >> Sascha Luck >> >>> --------- >>> >>> The next step is to help refine the problem statement. I would >>> appreciate it if working group participants with an interest in the >>> history of objects speak up and elaborate on the issue. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Job >>> >>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] NWI-2 - displaying history for DB objects where available
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] NWI-3 - AFRINIC IRR Homing
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]