This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Nick Hilliard nick at inex.ie
Fri Mar 11 15:11:19 CET 2016

denis wrote:

1.

> Sorry Elvis but you are neither a software engineer nor a regular user
> inputting data into the RIPE Database. So your unsubstantiated statement
> of 'poor' does not carry much weight.

2.

> This is not an open, bottom up process. This is a cartel of old
> timers who make all the decisions so they get their own way. This
> needs to be fixed.

Denis,

you can't have it both ways.

Nick

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]