This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Richard Hartmann richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Tue Mar 8 09:14:38 CET 2016

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
>
> I would like abuse-c: much more if it were changed in two ways:
>
>  - permit abuse-c: in inet(6)num: objects
>  - permit abuse-c: to point to a normal person: object, not only role:

This boils down to what I thought would have been the better
implementation all along.

Strong +1.


Richard

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]