This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

denis ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Mar 7 20:29:42 CET 2016

Hi Niall

On 07/03/2016 11:52, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
> On 7 Mar 2016, at 10:29, denis wrote:
>
>> Don't make emotive, vague comments like this....explain with facts.
>
> and a little further on:
>
>> When you work that one out they can apply the same principle to
>> "abuse-c:". Problem solved...

Not at all. the rest of the paragraph you edited out were the facts in 
this case.

cheers
denis

>
> Pot, kettle, etc.
> /Niall

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]