This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Suresh Ramasubramanian ops.lists at gmail.com
Mon Mar 7 13:36:04 CET 2016

On 07-Mar-2016, at 6:03 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
> 
> - permit abuse-c: in inet(6)num: objects
> - permit abuse-c: to point to a normal person: object, not only role:

[…]

I’m actually +1 with these.  And in fact even with the current spec there isn’t anything that says a person object can’t be abuse-c - though an outfit of any significant size might prefer to add a role account just so that multiple people can receive and handle abuse complaints.

—srs

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]