[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

[ contains question to NCC ]

> I have not seen one opinion clearly stating that abuse is not an issue
> and that they do not care about abuse.

the american idiom is "primrose path."  it looks good at the start but
you end up regretting walking it.  there are many issues of concern to
operators.  i would love to see a *usable* way to report a vulnerability
in your network, a routing issue, ...  but i know this ain't gonna work.

what data do the ncc need to do its job.  tech and admin.

but, let's not make assertions of others' needs.

NCC, to run the registry, do you need/want more than admin and tech?

randy