This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

andre at ox.co.za andre at ox.co.za
Sat Mar 5 05:32:28 CET 2016

On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 17:55:16 +0000
Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele at blacknight.com> wrote:
<snip>
> 
> We are not managing the internet, we are book keeping really.
> 
[...]

If you are correct (and imho you are)

the whole point of book keeping is to have accurate data and records

so, pick your poison. All POV leads to exactly the same thing: the ncc
needs accurate abuse-c as much as any of the other data.

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]