This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
denis
ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Mar 3 11:55:57 CET 2016
On 03/03/2016 11:49, Randy Bush wrote: >> In these days of political interest in how the internet is 'managed' the >> RIRs need to do more than 'just maintain an accurate registry'. The >> internet is a crucial part of modern life. Abuse is considered to be a >> serious problem. What you are saying is that you don't give a dam about >> abuse and are not interested in being part of the management of abuse. >> The more people who hold and publish this view, the more likely >> politicians are to get involved. > > your characterization of my argument is egregiously false. > > and i would rather govt regulation than regulation by a bunch of amateur > policy weenies. at least i get to vote on the former and have courts. I was not aware that the UN was elected :) cheers denis > > but i have nothing new to say and a plane to catch. enjoy. > > randy >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]