[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 15:25:50 +0900
Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
<snip>
> where you define responsibility.  the ncc is not a regulator, it is a
> coordinator.  if you want to be told how to run your network by weenie
> vigilantes, go to arin.
> randy
> 
whahahaha

I think the take away here is that abuse-c should contain accurate data.
What is the point if that any/all of the data could be fake or is empty?

Who decides what/which data fields is/are relevant/important and could
be fake/non existent etc?  

How/if/or/whatever the specific receiver of the data responds (/dev/null
- etc) is perfectly up to that network...