This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] NWI-3 - AFRINIC IRR Homing
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] NWI-3 - AFRINIC IRR Homing
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] NWI-3 - AFRINIC IRR Homing
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at ntt.net
Wed Jul 27 21:43:22 CEST 2016
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 07:32:48PM +0000, ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk wrote: > Hi Tim > Can we have some up to date numbers on how many (if any): <snip - leaving that for NCC/NIC staff> > Assuming any exist: > -How do you propose to handle any objects that have a version in both > databases that are different? Can't they just co-exist? And whoever can meet the authorisation requirements can delete either one of them. I think this is a question for AfriNIC to consider, not for the RIPE NCC staff. > -What do you propose to do with set objects that reference any of > these objects? What type of set objects are you specifically referring too? Generally operators use set expanders that span multiple databases. Speaking for myself in any of the networks I operate I don't see an issue whether the route objects are in RIPE or in AfriNIC's IRR. Just make sure your data source mirrors AfriNIC. > -How do you propose to handle any routing policy statements in other > ASN objects that refer to any objects from this set of affected > ROUTE(6) or ASN objects? Can't those references remain? References don't need to terminate in the same database. Kind regards, Job
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] NWI-3 - AFRINIC IRR Homing
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] NWI-3 - AFRINIC IRR Homing
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]