This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] Implementation proposal descr line

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Implementation proposal descr line
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Implementation proposal descr line

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

denis ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Jan 28 01:30:04 CET 2016

Hi Tim

On 27/01/2016 17:27, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote:
> This is our preferred option because not having
> duplicate possibly inconsistent data will improve data quality and
> reduce work.
>


This is EXACTLY the reason why it is a bad idea to enforce the addition 
of "abuse-c:" in ORGANISATION objects where it is not needed. You are 
forcing the addition of duplicate, possibly inconsistent data. Please be 
consistent in your approach.

cheers
denis

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Implementation proposal descr line
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Implementation proposal descr line

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]